Continued… The Southwest Gallery had an exhibit called something along the lines of The Two Georges that compared and contrasted US President George Washington and British King George III.
As we’d learned in Yorktown, when the colonies had been established, the Monarchy had been pretty hands-off. When King George III came to power in 1760, he pursued stricter policies of control over the colonies. Long story short, the American Revolution was basically the colonies saying no to this control, viewing the king as a tyrannical ruler who could not be reasoned with. King George III stayed in power until 1811, when he became too sick to rule. Rather than abdicating the throne, King George III had his son rule on his behalf as the Prince Regent. The king died in 1820.
George Washington was a wealthy farmer from Virginia. He became the commander-in-chief of the military during the Revolutionary War. The two Georges were literally fighting one another over control of the colonies. Washington resigned from the military when the war ended in 1783, but remained active in the politics of the new nation. He became the US’s first president in 1789 and was in power until 1797, when he chose to retire despite being encouraged to run for a third term. The exhibit made a point of stating that Washington voluntarily relinquished power while King George clung to power to the very end, even when he was too sick to rule. Washington died unexpectedly in 1799 from an infection, only three-years after leaving office.
Both Georges were Enlightenment men who were into science and agricultural advancements. George III was an important patron of scientists and explorers, funding people such as Captain James Cook, naturalist Joseph Banks and astronomer William Herschel. Washington had wanted to establish a university in the Capital, believing that “flourishing the state of the arts and sciences” would lead to “national prosperity and reputation.” Both Georges owned this book on botany/horticulture.






